TL;DR
Apollo.io offers 4 tiers from free to $119/user/month. The free tier is generous (50 credits) but per-seat pricing means costs scale fast — a 5-person team on Professional pays $4,740/year. For DevTool teams, the bigger issue is Apollo has no GitHub signal intelligence.
Apollo.io Pricing Breakdown
Prices are for annual billing. Monthly billing available at higher rates. Credits are for exporting/revealing contact details.
The Credit System Explained
Apollo.io's credit system is one of the most frequently misunderstood parts of its pricing. Here's how it works:
- What costs a credit: Revealing a contact's email address or phone number from Apollo's database. Each reveal costs 1 credit.
- What's free: Searching and viewing contact profiles (without contact info), basic filters, seeing company data, and running sequences on contacts you've already unlocked.
- Credits reset monthly. Unused credits do not roll over to the next month.
- Add-on credits are available at approximately $0.20 per credit, allowing you to buy more if you hit your monthly limit.
- Organization plan has "unlimited" credits but is subject to fair use limits (not truly unlimited for high-volume scrapers).
The credit model is important to understand because it means your effective cost per lead increases as you need to reveal more contacts. At scale, add-on credit costs can exceed your base subscription.
Real Cost Calculator
Here's what Apollo.io actually costs for different team sizes, using the Professional plan billed annually:
Note: These are base subscription costs. If your team regularly needs more than the included credits, add-on costs at $0.20/credit will increase the total. A team that burns through 10,000 extra credits per month adds $2,000 to the annual bill.
Apollo.io vs LeadCognition Pricing
Apollo.io and LeadCognition serve different needs, but they overlap on one dimension: finding contact information for people to outreach to. Here's how they compare directly:
Cognition
When Apollo Makes Sense
Apollo.io is a strong choice when:
- You need broad B2B outbound at scale. Apollo's database has 275M+ contacts. If you're prospecting by job title, company size, industry, and location — Apollo gives you a massive pool to work from.
- You run email sequences in-tool. Apollo's built-in sequencing lets you prospect and engage in one platform without a separate tool like Outreach or Salesloft.
- Budget is tight but you need volume. The free tier (50 credits) is genuinely functional for solo prospectors. The $49/month Basic plan is accessible for most startups.
- You're selling to non-technical buyers. If your ICP is a VP of Sales, CMO, or Finance exec, Apollo's traditional database approach works well. Their job titles and company data are comprehensive.
When to Consider Alternatives
Apollo falls short for certain use cases:
DevTool companies targeting developers
Apollo's contact database is built for traditional B2B sales — identifying contacts by company, title, and industry. It does not track GitHub activity. A developer who just starred your SDK, forked your repo, or opened a PR on a competing tool is showing live, high-intent buying behavior that Apollo doesn't capture at all.
For DevTool companies, LeadCognition fills this gap. It identifies developers by their actual GitHub behavior — not their job title — and enriches each with verified email and LinkedIn. You know not just who they are, but exactly what they did on GitHub and when.
Signal-based outreach vs. spray-and-pray
Apollo's model is inherently a volume game: search for contacts matching your ICP, export emails, run sequences. This works, but open rates and reply rates for cold outbound are declining industry-wide.
Signal-based outreach — reaching out to someone who just performed a relevant GitHub action — consistently outperforms cold lists because you have a genuine, specific reason to contact them. LeadCognition's AI playbooks help you turn each GitHub signal into a personalized first message.
When per-seat cost becomes prohibitive
At $79/user/month on Professional, a 10-person SDR team spends $9,480/year just on subscriptions before buying any add-on credits. LeadCognition's org-level pricing ($0-$399/month for the entire organization, not per seat) often represents better unit economics for SDR teams where multiple people share one signal feed.
The Bottom Line on Apollo.io Pricing
Apollo.io offers genuinely good value at its price points — particularly the Professional tier for solo SDRs and small teams. The free tier is more functional than most free plans in the category. The credit system is intuitive once you understand it.
The key limitation for DevTool companies is that Apollo is a contact database, not a signal intelligence platform. It tells you who your buyers are based on company and title. It doesn't tell you what they're doing right now on GitHub, which is where developer buying intent actually lives.
The best approach for many DevTool sales teams is to use both: LeadCognition for identifying warm GitHub-signal leads, and Apollo (or a similar tool) for broader outbound to ICP accounts that haven't engaged with GitHub yet.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does Apollo.io cost?
Is Apollo.io free?
What are Apollo.io credits used for?
How much does Apollo.io cost for a 5-person team?
What is the difference between Apollo.io and LeadCognition?
Does Apollo.io have GitHub intent data?
Related pages